![]() ![]() Yes, it might-though Issa is unlikely to be a strong voice leading the call. Representative Darrell Issa said we need a special prosecutor for the Russian election interference. The only way to move from speculation and partial evidence is a genuine investigation (and, yes, more journalism). It would be unwise, unfair, and damaging for any of us to go beyond the evidence. The second would be financial complications: In other words, did, or does, the President have any business relations that raise legal questions? Finally, does Russian intelligence have information on the President that might potentially influence his work? There are far-from-definitive answers to any of these questions, which is why law enforcement and congressional bodies need to hold fair, rigorous, and unbiased investigations. The Russia-related questions that would be problematic for President Trump would be potential collusion (did he or anyone in his circle participate in or know about or help in any way a Russian effort to "hack" the election?). What does it take to link Trump to this? -Gria Andolina On Facebook and Twitter, we asked readers to submit questions they had after reading the article. Earlier this month, The New Yorker published “ Trump, Putin, and the New Cold War,” an examination of what lay behind Russia’s interference in the 2016 election-and what lies ahead.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |